ABOUT THE NEWS- LETTER
RADICAL MIDDLE, THE BOOK:
OUR CONGRES- SIONAL SCORECARDS:
OUR POLITICAL BOOK AWARD WINNERS:
RESPONSES FROM OTHERS:
WHO WE ARE:
June 15, 2005 -- Mark Satin, Editor
2008: The year a strong centrist independent becomes president?
by John Avlon
Mainstream speculation about the 2008 presidential election has ignored the pivotal influence of the fastest-growing group of voters in America -- independents.
This massive rejection of politics as usual has been papered over by Karl Rove's play-to-the-base strategy and Howard Dean's manic equal and opposite reaction. But if the two parties insist on rejecting independent voters by nominating polarizing conservative and liberal candidates, 2008 could be the year that a strong centrist independent is elected president as part of a bipartisan national unity ticket.
It is an unlikely but not at all impossible scenario.
For example, if the Democrats cannot resist the temptation to nominate Hillary Clinton, and establishment social-conservative pull their strings in the primary to put the Senate majority leader, Bill Frist, on the ballot, a large number of moderates from both parties and independents would demand an alternative.
The Democrats so far lack a national candidate who commands respect across party lines, but Republicans have both Mayor Giuliani and Senator McCain.
Not coincidentally, Messrs. Giuliani and McCain are consistently the two leading candidates among Republicans and voters nationwide in the Marist poll. They campaigned tirelessly for President Bush in 2004 and are working to build bridges within their party, but they are bitterly opposed by some members of the far-right for being too moderate.
The key question of the 2008 election will be whether this minority will be able to exert an effective veto before the general election.
The two-party system is set up to make successful independent candidacies difficult. Such a campaign would be few serious candidates' first choice -- it is far tougher to win the presidency without the existing infrastructure of a party.
But with Americans offered a variety of choices in every other aspect of their lives, being required to choose between the lesser of two evils in elections is losing its common sense relevance.
The two parties like to dismiss or distort the growing number of independents because it makes their job easier. To this end, states don't have consistent rules regarding party registration, and in many states voters are lumped in as unaffiliated if they ask to be registered as independent.
Regardless, taken as an aggregate, the shift toward independents is startling, even in the politically saturated opening states of the presidential primary contest.
In the first caucus state of Iowa, 38% of all voters are now not registered with either the Democratic or Republican party, while in the pivotal first primary state of New Hampshire, in which Mr. McCain beat then-Governor Bush by 19 points, 85% of new voters have been registering independent.
South Carolina's subsequent primary is notoriously conservative, but both Governor Mark Sanford and Senator Lindsay Graham backed the maverick centrist Senator McCain against the Republican establishment's wishes in 2000 -- and their influence has only advanced in the intervening years.
A glance at the shifting election demographics nationwide gives a good sense of how grassroots politics in the information age have shifted even as the parties stick to the old industrial age playbook:
In the next election cycle of 2006, at least two potentially significant gubernatorial candidates are planning to run as independents -- Virginia state senator Russ Potts and Texas country musician turned comic novelist Kinky Friedman. Both have turned to key personnel from Jesse Ventura's successful 1998 independent run for governor of Minnesota.
Independent centrists have had success in running for governor, especially in the past 15 years. Independents running for President are a different story – the most successful effort to date was by former President Theodore Roosevelt in 1912 who won 27% as the candidate of the Progressive Party.
But the fascination with an independent president remains, with increased reason to back it up. A new Harris Interactive poll shows that 85% of Americans believe we need more elected politicians who will vote independently rather than on party lines, while 67% favor candidates who are Independent.
In the current (July/August 2005) issue of The Atlantic, James Fallows writes a memo to a 2016 front running third-party presidential candidate, driven to office by a political dynamic described as "Democrats can't win, and the Republicans can't govern" -- especially on the issue of fiscal responsibility, which in this futuristic scenario has led to protracted economic depression.
Fallows's memo recalls circumstances that spurred the last serious independent candidacy for president, by Ross Perot in 1992. Mr. Perot called together a broad coalition of fiscal conservatives, government reformers, and Republicans nervous about the growing influence of the religious right. He led both Bill Clinton and then-President Bush in polls before briefly dropping out and then stumbling back into the race, finishing with 19%.
This original one-fifth of the electorate and its growing number of inheritors are still politically homeless -- in fact, their grievances have gotten worse. The party that reaches out to them can realign politics to its benefit for decades to come.
But if both parties fail to do so, in the name of playing to their base, they may unleash a series of events that ushers in a new era in American politics.
John Avlon, b. 1973, worked on Bill Clinton's re-election campaign, then was Mayor Giuliani's chief speechwriter from 1997-2001. He is the author of Independent Nation (Crown / Random House, pbk. 2005).
ABOUT THE RADICAL MIDDLE CONCEPT
GREAT RADICAL MIDDLE GROUPS AND BLOGS:
SOME PRIOR RADICAL MIDDLE INITIATIVES:
SOME RADICAL MIDDLE LESSONS:
SOME PRIOR WRITINGS BY MARK SATIN:
NOT JUST RADICAL MIDDLE: